Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Jodie Miners

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Jodie Miners

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. The field name is a little further away from the field box on the RRC

  2. The content is cut off on the RRC - more content is displayed in the LWC. It looks like the font is bigger in the RRC but it’s not.

  3. The drop down arrow is not the same size. The field is shorter vertically in the RRC - it looks better in the LWC.

  4. Ah, that’s the reason the content is cut off, the fields are not the same size they are larger in the LWC.

Dropdown Box

...

  • The LWC has a very different check mark.

  • The list sits below the field, not covering it like the RRC does. The LWC looks better in that regard.

Warning

For a company with the vast development resources of Salesforce, and the great thing that is the SLDS that is the published guide as to how to build and style components to look like Salesforce, why are these things an issue? Is it SLDS trying to change standards and base Lightning devs haven’t got around to changing their styles yet? Or is it just a lack of attention to detail? Why? Why do I have to try to explain to my users why things look a little weird between different components on the page?

It is more of an issue because the Dynamic Forms and Dynamic Actions seems to follow the SLDS styling which means their pages look vastly different to the standard pages they used to be. And you can’t put a RRC on a Dynamic Forms page without these styles clashing. And you absolutely NEED to have RRC on Dynamic Forms pages because they don’t handle spanning relationships yet.